Symptom Status of Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy in Canada and United States.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated significant geographic variations in the management of carotid artery stenosis despite standard guidelines. To further characterize these practice variations, we assessed differences in patient selection, operative technique, and outcomes for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in Canada vs. United States. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) was used to identify all patients who underwent CEA between 2010 and 2019 in Canada and United States. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were recorded and differences between countries were assessed using independent t-test and chi-square test. The primary outcome was the percentage of CEA performed for asymptomatic versus symptomatic disease. The secondary outcomes were 30-day and long-term stroke or death. Associations between country and outcomes were assessed using univariate/multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 131,411 US patients and 701 Canadian patients underwent CEA in VQI sites. Patients from the US were older with more comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. The use of a shunt, patch, drain, or protamine was less common in the US. Most patients had 70 - 99% stenosis, with no difference between regions. The percentage of CEA performed for asymptomatic disease was significantly higher in the US even after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics (72.4% vs. 30.7%, adjusted OR 3.91 [95% CI 3.21 - 4.78], p < 0.001). Thirty-day stroke/death was low (1.8% vs. 1.9%) and 1-year stroke/death was similar between groups (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.69 - 1.39], P = 0.89). The similarities in 1-year stroke/death persisted in asymptomatic patients (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.37 - 1.30], P = 0.26) and symptomatic patients (HR 1.14 [95% CI 0.74 - 1.73], P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant variations in CEA practice between Canada and US. In particular, most US patients are treated for asymptomatic disease, whereas most Canadian patients are treated for symptomatic disease. Furthermore, adjunctive procedures including shunting, patch use, and protamine administration are performed less commonly in the US. Despite these differences, perioperative and 1-year stroke/death rates are similar between countries. Future studies should investigate reasons for these variations and quality improvement projects are needed to standardize care.

Rates of Intervention for Claudication versus Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in Canada and United States.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated important geographic variations in peripheral artery disease (PAD) management despite existing guidelines. We assessed differences in patient characteristics, procedural technique, and outcomes for PAD interventions in Canada versus United States. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) was used to identify all patients who underwent endovascular intervention or surgical bypass for PAD between 2010 and 2019 in Canada and United States. Independent t-test and chi-square test were performed to assess differences between countries in terms of demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics. The primary outcome was the percentage of interventions performed for claudication versus chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Perioperative outcomes were in-hospital mortality and index limb amputation. The long-term outcome was 1-year amputation-free survival. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed to investigate associations between region and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 246,770 US patients and 3,467 Canadian patients underwent revascularization for PAD during the study period. There was a higher proportion of endovascular interventions in the US (75.9% vs. 69.2%, OR 1.41 [95% CI 1.31-1.51], P< 0.001). American patients were younger with more comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease. The percentage of interventions performed for claudication was significantly higher in the US (42.3% vs. 35.7%, OR 1.31 [95% CI 1.22-1.44], P< 0.001). This persisted after controlling for demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics (adjusted OR 1.05 [95% CI 1.01-1.10], P = 0.02). Perioperative outcomes were similar between countries after adjustment for baseline differences: in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.07 [95% CI 0.69-1.62], P= 0.75) and index limb amputation (adjusted OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.43-1.07], P= 0.09). However, 1-year amputation-free survival was higher in the US (84.1% vs. 71.0%, HR 1.61 [95% CI 1.47-1.76], P< 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that the factor most strongly associated with index limb amputation or death at 1-year was intervention for CLTI (HR 1.56 [95% CI 1.54-1.58], P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant variations in PAD management between US and Canada. In particular, a higher proportion of interventions are performed for claudication rather than CLTI in the US compared to Canada. This is an important contributor to the higher 1-year amputation-free survival rate in US patients. Reasons for these differences should be assessed by future studies and evidence-based care may be standardized by targeted quality improvement projects.

Thresholds for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Canada and United States.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated significant geographic variations in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) despite standard guidelines. Differences in patient selection, operative technique, and outcomes for AAA repair in Canada versus United States were assessed. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative was used to identify all patients who underwent elective endovascular or open AAA repair between 2010 and 2019 in Canada and the United States. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were recorded and differences between countries were assessed using independent t test and χ2 test. The primary outcome was the percentage of AAA repaired below recommended diameter thresholds (men, <5.5 cm; women, <5.0 cm). The secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates. Associations between region and outcomes were assessed using univariate/multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: There were 51,455 U.S. patients and 1451 Canadian patients who underwent AAA repair in Vascular Quality Initiative sites during the study period. There was a higher proportion of endovascular repairs in the United States (83.7% vs 68.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13-2.63; P < .001). U.S. patients had more comorbidities, including hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and prior revascularization. The percentage of AAA repaired below recommended thresholds was significantly higher in the United States (38.8% vs 15.2%; OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 3.03-4.17; P < .001). This difference persisted after controlling for demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics (adjusted OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 2.63-4.17; P < .001). Factors that predicted AAA repair below recommended thresholds were U.S. region (adjusted OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 3.03-4.17), male sex (adjusted OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.72-3.07), and endovascular repair (adjusted OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.95-2.21). The in-hospital mortality rate was low (1.0% vs 0.8%) and the 1-year rate mortality was similar between countries (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.70-1.31; P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant variations in AAA management between Canada and the United States. A greater proportion of U.S. patients underwent AAA repair below the recommended diameter thresholds. This finding is partly driven by a higher percentage of endovascular repairs. Despite these differences, the perioperative and 1-year mortality rates are similar. Future studies should investigate reasons for these variations and quality improvement projects are needed to standardize care.